Climate Change Theories. Facts about co2 and the Climate Change Fraud, Hoax, Scam. Note: Climate Change is Not Fake.
Climate Change Theories.
Facts about CO2 and the Climate Change Fraud, Hoax, Scam.
Note: Climate Change is Not Fake.
But don't believe the politically correct story.
CLIMATE CHANGE: IMMINENT APOCALYPSE?
SCAM? FRAUD? HOAX? TIME FOR FACTS
I'm too busy. Get informed on the whole climate change debate as well as everything else!?!? It's just too much!!
I kept saying that for years. And that was my feeling.
I had, through a friend, seen Not Evil, Just Wrong which tore apart Al Gore's An Inconvenient Truth. I strongly recommend it. Clearly, the truth about climate change was far from what Al Gore presented. His apocalyptic vision did not go with the facts. I came away from Not Evil, Just Wrong with that firm in my mind.
I also, through the same friend, saw FrackNation, "a journalist's search for the fracking truth" - which showed that what was presented in GasLands on the horrors of fracking was a bunch of lies.
But I didn't look further.
It was all just too much.
And then, into my inbox came 2 short videos from Prager U. How could I say no to those - they were less than 5 minutes each. I could watch them over breakfast, especially when the presenter was none other than Patrick Moore, PhD in Environmental Studies, one of the most experienced and trustworthy scientists of our time, and one of the 2 founders of Greenpeace - the one that many Greenpeace people shudder at, but someone I've come to know as a person with deep integrity.
So I watched. Maybe you'd like to, as well:
What They Haven't Told You about Climate Change PragerU - 540,972 views (when I watched)
The Truth about CO2 PragerU - 370,188 views (when I watched)
And then, you know how it is, one thing led to another - especially when someone criticized the Prager U videos as not giving sources. Or course they didn't!! They were each less than 5 minutes.
So I kept watching.
Nobel Laureate Ivar Giaever Smashes
the Global Warming Hoax
And then I came upon an interview with Donna Laframboise, an investigative reporter who started out neutral, just curious about the whole climate change fuss. She started exploring and repeatedly heard only one side. Her next step: meticulous research that led to an irrefutable conclusion: the most reputable organization on climate change does not do what it claims to do. It does not base its conclusions all on peer-reviewed literature. It does not have major scientists in charge, but has PhD and even MA students in charge of some sections of their report.
Here is it - interview with Donna Laframboise:
More at: NOCONSENSUS.ORG
One video led to another:
The Faux "97% Consensus" (June 2015)
Bob Carter, professor
- from the
- shows activism (faculty, students, government) vs science
Global Warming Science (2012)
Bob Carter, professor
- excellent overview of data, using scientific methods
John Christy, climate scientist
- investigated for not giving orthodox view
- accusations against him - a threat against scientists
- yet his information is based on findings (like on the layers of atmosphere, etc)
Christopher Monckton - Our Last Year of Freedom?
- a warning about handing power away from national governments to UN, EU, etc
Christopher Monckton - Agenda 21's Globalist Death Plan for Humanity
- shows UN wants world government, control (they call it world governance)
- this is a way of circumventing democracy, transferring power from the elected to a non-elected dictatorship
- there is an ever-increasing bureaucracy (expanding power, sending bill to governments, saying it was agreed to)
More at INFOWARS.COM
Mark Steyn - The Fraudulent Hockey Stick
- from the 10th ICCC
- he's being sued by Dr Mann re the fraudulent hockey stick
- in fact, each is suing the other for millions of dollars
Am I an expert now? If you watch these videos, will you be an expert?
No. But I am informed enough to be not only sure that the Al Gore story is false, but that I can send people to lots of online sources proving that. I'm informed enough to be sure that politically correct (loud and vociferous) activism is getting in the way of information. I'm informed enough to know that the most reputable source, quoted left and right, is seriously flawed, as it cites non-peer-reviewed literature if it can't find peer-reviewed literature that says what it wants to present as truth. I'm informed enough to know that the politically correct response (notably, name-calling those who dare to question the dominant narrative about the coming climate change apocalypse) is once again dangerous to truth, to freedom of thought and speech.
I'm expert enough now.
If you feel you'd like to learn more, enjoy the videos.